4 ms·
Proof positive that paying for a product doesn't pre-empt the vendor from collecting your data anyway to monetize something else. The real question is, who's p
by rchaud 2y ago
Proof positive that paying for a product doesn't pre-empt the vendor from collecting your data anyway to monetize something else.
The real question is, who's paying $500 for the privilege of being a willing mule for Zuck's surveillance empire building dreams?
- dylan604 2y agoAt this point, if it has the Meta name on it, you'd be pretty safe in thinking that collecting data will be part of its purpose
- candiddevmike 2y agoThe real "meta" of Meta.
- timeon 2y agoI still remember time when spyware was considered on same level as virus. Now it is just: 'we care about your privacy, allow us to sell it'.
- jajko 2y ago"allow", unless I see the code and DB and all data flows on it for all branches, its extremely safe to presume with companies like Meta that with private data they do morally the worst thing possible, and breaking laws is just part of business. Why the naivety in 2024. Company that stores users password in plaintext (recent EU fine) ain't the forefront of user security in any meaningful way. Thats core of their market value, just think for a second what is valuable to them and what they couldn't care less about.