4 ms·
Seems like the link should be https://backreference.org/2010/02/10/idiomatic-awk/ https://backreference.org/2010/02/10/idiomatic-awk/ instead of https://backref
by asicsp 2y ago
Seems like the link should be https://backreference.org/2010/02/10/idiomatic-awk/ https://backreference.org/2010/02/10/idiomatic-awk/ instead of https://backreference.org/index.html https://backreference.org/index.html
- StefanBatory 2y agoYes - but I am sure I sent the first link. I'm not sure what has happened then.
- kencausey 2y agoI think that it is this in the head: <link rel="canonical" href="index.html"> I had to stop submitting ISC SANS posts because they similarly have a canonical link in their head which HN, for reasons I'm not sure about, use to 'correct' the URL, errantly.
- dang 2y agoRight you are! I can turn that off for specific domains - if you email the relevant info to hn@ycombinator.com I'll take a look.
- kencausey 2y agoThanks. I'm not sure it is going to be necessary. I checked the ISC diary site again yesterday and I think they have corrected their 'link rel="canonical"' header. I will try to submit one again when I see an interesting one.
- mananaysiempre 2y agoAlso, (2010).
- Lammy 2y agoWait until you find out how old AWK is
- dang 2y agoFixed now. Thanks!