4 ms·
Well, that happened with some European cities as a result of WW2. I remember a celebration in the late 1980s for a retiring British architect/art historian, wh
by Keysh 2y ago
Well, that happened with some European cities as a result of WW2.
I remember a celebration in the late 1980s for a retiring British architect/art historian, who reminisced about being an architecture student during the Blitz in London. While he and his pals sheltered underground during the bombing, they shared a (slightly shameful) excitement about the prospect of rebuilding London with "something new" after the war was over.
In contrast to some European cities, where the goal was to recreate as much of the pre-war architecture as possible, postwar London was, as I understand it, rebuilt with lots of new architecture. My impression is that most people think a lot of it was pretty terrible.
- yunohn 2y agoInteresting, thanks for that history! I can empathize with modern attempts at buildings looking ugly and soulless. But I feel that’s part of the point of transience - the next generation can rebuild it in their style. It’s also the problem with how every city becomes overpacked and unlivable when things change, as nothing is future proof. We shouldn’t continually impose our choices (architectural, zoning, location) on all subsequent generations.