3 ms·
> One, the meaning of that phrase is much more ambiguous than the right to vote. Please elaborate on this ambiguous standard. How "ambiguous" must a right be f
by willcipriano 2y ago
> One, the meaning of that phrase is much more ambiguous than the right to vote.
Please elaborate on this ambiguous standard. How "ambiguous" must a right be for it to be gated via ID and fees?
> Two, you can buy a gun without ID at a gun show.
A common misconception, please stop spreading misinformation.
> Generally, all firearms purchases and transfers, including private party transactions and sales at gun shows, must be made through a California licensed dealer under the Dealer’s Record of Sale (DROS) process
> As part of the DROS process, the purchaser must present "clear evidence of identity and age" which is defined as a valid, non-expired California Driver's License or Identification Card issued by the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).
https://oag.ca.gov/firearms/pubfaqs https://oag.ca.gov/firearms/pubfaqs
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> elaborate on this ambiguous standard It’s been debated at our highest court since the 1970s. > common misconception, please stop spreading misinformation It was true in August where my friend bought a gun with cash at a gun show! (It was in Wyoming.)
- willcipriano 2y agoThis story is about California. One would expect it's own laws to be internally consistent.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> story is about California. One would expect it's own laws to be internally consistent Sacramento has made it clear it doesn’t believe in an individual right to arms. It’s internally consistent in the same way Wyoming’s (and most red states’) voter ID + free-for-all gun show rules are.