3 ms·
As to Rao-fox-lion quadrantology.. how to classify pear AI problem? (We can say nang et al were barbarians promoted to founders but that is cheap*. Otoh 1 o the
by gradschoolfail 2y ago
As to Rao-fox-lion quadrantology.. how to classify pear AI problem? (We can say nang et al were barbarians promoted to founders but that is cheap*. Otoh 1 o the more interesting facts from that case is some partners attempting to empirically price their social media marketing thesis)
JPsmith on JCScott Against the Grain has another take on Rao, proweird being the barbarians trading with the State
Tfound the crucial clause on pants from the Psmith-on-Stripe-Clueless that you pointed at
*>derives much of [][] moral and affective sympathies from the claim that [][] is smarter and better and more efficient [s/_/effective] than anybody else
Insert insider,expert,Feynman,YC,lion,officer,peer,etc
& Whatever is the Other’s (prole,designor,founder,funder,clueless,loser,customer,peer)’s fave metric!
- 082349872349872 2y agowrt https://www.thepsmiths.com/p/review-scaling-people-by-claire-hughes#footnote-13-130267993 https://www.thepsmiths.com/p/review-scaling-people-by-claire... , something else about the early middle ages: During the XIII, tournaments were open invite, and were pretty much war games held over the fields in between villages. Of course, it's very unlikely that anyone not already an aristo could show up with horses and panoply, let alone show up and prove de facto effective, but the few that did had a chance there to win even more horses and armour by ransoming off any captured actual aristos. Well before the XVIII, tournaments switched to closed format, held in specially built arenas, and an official part of the tournament included going around the room and having everyone introduce themselves (or be introduced, to be even fancier) which de jure kept out any gatecrashed aspiring riffraff. Might (for those that have central bank control, anyway) imposing an irregular tidal ebb be a useful variant of mode-switching, in order to effectively signal who's wearing (or not) their budgie smugglers?
- 082349872349872 2y agoPear AI: according to NdBdM's original* scheme, Nang et al were foxes, who had schemed, yet could not defend themselves from the wolf (according to russians, wolves are the "paramedics of the forest", for despite not being doctors, they take care of the sick and elderly...). YC? I suppose they should, if it isn't already there, add some legalese to closing documents so founders bear full responsibility for bringing a clean venture to the table. (there could be a different split of responsibility, but since YC is running a retail operation I wouldn't expect one) * Had Machiavelli, in writing (1532): > You must know there are two ways of contesting, the one by the law, the other by force; the first method is proper to men, the second to beasts; but because the first is frequently not sufficient, it is necessary to have recourse to the second. Therefore it is necessary for a prince to understand how to avail himself of the beast and the man. This has been figuratively taught to princes by ancient writers, who describe how Achilles and many other princes of old were given to the Centaur Chiron to nurse, who brought them up in his discipline; which means solely that, as they had for a teacher one who was half beast and half man... been referring to Cicero, De Officiis (44 BC)? http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2007.01.0048%3Abook%3D1%3Asection%3D34 http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%... > ...there are two ways of settling a dispute: first, by discussion; second, by physical force; and since the former is characteristic of man, the latter of the brute, we must resort to force only in case we may not avail ourselves of discussion. (I'm surprised I've not read this work until now. With a little skimming, it confirms my reverse-engineering of the cardinal virtues as arising as oppositions [albeit not strictly pairwise]: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2007.01.0048%3Abook%3D1%3Asection%3D15 http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%... http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2007.01.0048%3Abook%3D1%3Asection%3D17 http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%... and has interesting things to say about Castalia: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2007.01.0048%3Abook%3D1%3Asection%3D28 http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%... about immigration: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2007.01.0048%3Abook%3Dpos%3D3%3Asection%3D47 http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%... Gemeinschaft vs Gesellschaft: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2007.01.0048%3Abook%3D1%3Asection%3D22 http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%... and even Pareto Optimality: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2007.01.0048%3Abook%3Dpos%3D3%3Asection%3D21 http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%... ) EDIT: no, lifted, negated, and expanded to chapter length! http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2007.01.0048%3Abook%3D1%3Asection%3D41 http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%...
- gradschoolfail 2y agoWhat is your personal take on the smuggling of budgie smugglers? is it fraudulent? Central bank: HN had a bit to say on MF’s thermostat, id=4915751, rayiner on pubgoods 4915946 psmith pants-mongering on JW Central Banking 101 (very likely that one o both psmiths econometrician, btw): >On twitter you can see our real rulers humiliating themselves [meanwhile on HN…] On immigration i submit that it is morally wrong to avail foreigners of the capital destructive tools of the geographic rome of our times (which some, ahem, poets identify as carthage of Moloch)
- aebtebeten 2y agoI arbitrage away regulatory inefficiencies You are a smuggler They fraudulently profit (but we shouldn't expect much budgie smuggler smuggling, because although they are small and light, they aren't worth anything. Cicero claims most quotidian decisions are taken between more honourable and less honourable or more expedient or less expedient, and that it is exceptional to weigh the less honourable but more expedient course against the more honourable but less expedient; in this case smuggling budgie smugglers is neither) Is econometrics something like https://xkcd.com/1838/ https://xkcd.com/1838/ ? Re: rayiner, I'd say Pareto was right on there: a think tank's job is not to discern, as Cicero would have it, but to come up with derivations that fit their funders' residues. As far as twitter goes, I'm pretty sure foxes have more sense [this is also one of the areas where I take issue with the psmiths[0]: they don't seem to think of CEOs as the hired help; high class house servants as The Virginian (1902) puts it]; the lion has a huge mane but the fox has at least two exits to its den (and, if we believe the eastern tales, more than one[1] tail). We do get to see some amazing spin on it, though: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jE0GTgTzoxs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jE0GTgTzoxs [0] with Cicero, it'd be his spiessig bent — but looking at his background he would be; wouldn't he? [1] to what extent are prison tattoos a means of making it impossible to become a turncoat/change tails? (compare Maori moko: your face is your id card?) EDIT: forgot capital destruction; that's a wonderful example of a lion (the Rastafarian one) infamous for doing the foxes' dirty work.
- 082349872349872 2y ago