3 ms·
I know no one will believe this but I'm reasonably sure I proved P!=NP earlier this week. It was very similar to a previous unsolved problem in a "haha, histor
by usednoise4sale 2y ago
I know no one will believe this but I'm reasonably sure I proved P!=NP earlier this week.
It was very similar to a previous unsolved problem in a "haha, history repeats itself" sort of way.
This comment might have a lot more comments someday.
- OrigamiPastrami 2y agoI don't believe you, but you can always prove me wrong and share your proof.
- usednoise4sale 2y agoWell, it was recent, so I'm currently in the 'feedback and validation' stage. I've reached out to experts for feedback, but these things do take time. If you have a genuine interest, and especially if you could provide feedback or warm introductions to someone who can, I'm happy to share. You can email me at atmanthedog at Google's free email service domain. Put something HN related in the subject. *If you do, please share your mathematical background so I can better tailor a response.
- geysersam 2y ago"I have discovered a truly marvelous demonstration of the proposition that P/=NP but this HN comment is too short to contain it..." Eagerly awaiting your published proof
- seanhunter 2y agoThat's fantastic if true. Make sure you check out the Clay institute's page and collect your prize.[1] [1] https://www.claymath.org/millennium/p-vs-np/ https://www.claymath.org/millennium/p-vs-np/ and especially https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/pvsnp.pdf https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/pvsnp.pd...
- fbarred 2y agoYou might avoid common pitfalls by reading "Eight Signs A Claimed P≠NP Proof Is Wrong": https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=458 https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=458.