3 ms·
Just to clarify, I didn't say anything about the OP's "ability to learn". I know nothing about that and can't tell anything about it from their comment. I also
by YeGoblynQueenne 2y ago
Just to clarify, I didn't say anything about the OP's "ability to learn". I know nothing about that and can't tell anything about it from their comment. I also didn't say anything about how our brain works, or about "the tendrils of ML overlords".
If you want to have a debate, I'm all for it, but if you're going to go around imagining things that I may have said in another timeline then I don't see what's the point of that.
- peteforde 2y agoYour comment said, in many more words, that to embrace LLMs for learning or knowledge enhancement might pay off in the short term but will leave you stunted and operating in a local maximum of potential and possibility. You could be right, but I strongly suspect that you are actually wrong.
- YeGoblynQueenne 2y agoNope. I said that refusing to learn something will leave you stunted. I did not say that using an LLM will leave you stunted. The OP said: >>> For example my Python knowledge is limited and I don't really use it often, so I don't want to spend time to better learn it. And I replied: >> Respectfully but that's a bit like saying you don't need to learn how to ride a bicycle because you can use a pair of safety wheels. It's an excuse to not learn something, to keep yourself less knowledgeable and skillful than you could really be. Why stunt yourself? Knowledge is power. "It's an excuse to not learn something (...) Why stunt yourself?".