In my view we should also stop taking the Great Technoking at his word and move away from lionizing this old well-moneyed elite in general. Real technological

In my view we should also stop taking the Great Technoking at his word and move away from lionizing this old well-moneyed elite in general. Real technological progress in the 21st century is more capital-intensive than before. It also usually requires more diverse talent. Yet the breakthroughs we can make in this half-century can be far greater than any before: commercial-grade fusion power (where Lawrence Livermore National Lab currently leads, thanks to AI[1]), quantum computing, spintronics, twistronics, low-cost room-temperature superconductors, advanced materials, advanced manufacturing, nanotechnology. Thus, it's much more about the many, not the one. Multi-stakeholder. Multi-person. Often led by one technology leader, sure, but this one person must uplift and be accountable to the many. Otherwise we get the OpenAI story, and end-justifies-the-means type of groupthink wrt. those who worship the technoking. [1]: https://www.llnl.gov/article/49911/high-performance-computing-ai-cognitive-simulation-helped-llnl-conquer-fusion-ignition https://www.llnl.gov/article/49911/high-performance-computin...