tl;dr author complains that Sam's predictions of the future of AI are inflated (but doesn't offer any of his own), and complains that AI tools that surprised us

tl;dr author complains that Sam's predictions of the future of AI are inflated (but doesn't offer any of his own), and complains that AI tools that surprised us last year look mundane now. The article is written to appeal to people who want to feel clever casually slagging off and dismissing tech. > it appears to have plateaued. GPT-4 now looks less like the precursor to a superintelligence and more like … well, any other chatbot. What a pathetic observation. Does the author not recall how bad chatbots were pre-LLMs? What LLMs can do blows my mind daily. There might be some insufferable hype atm, but gees, the math and engineering behind LLMs is incredible, and it's not done yet - they're still improving from more compute alone, not even factoring in architecture discoveries and innovations!