3 ms·
"That anyone can whip up in a few minutes" is doing a lot of work. I think maybe a few tens of thousands of people worldwide have any idea of what you're even t
by knowaveragejoe 2y ago
"That anyone can whip up in a few minutes" is doing a lot of work. I think maybe a few tens of thousands of people worldwide have any idea of what you're even talking about.
- hiddencost 2y agoI dunno, I think literally millions of people have taken Andrew Ng's intro to ML. Something like 11k papers were submitted to ICLR this year.
- throwaway314155 2y agoNot sure if those numbers are right but if so, you just cured my imposter syndrome (for today at least).
- jen729w 2y ago'Few tens of thousands' is for sure low. But if we talk in percentage of adult humans ... let's pull 1,000,000 out of thin air as the number who understood what that meant, that's 0.02% of adult humans. An anecdote: recently, we mentioned ChatGPT to my partner's mother. She had never heard of it. Zero recognition. Revel in your expertise, friend!
- obviyus 2y agoIt’s the classic HN Dropbox comment, even 17 years on: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224
- whimsicalism 2y agoMaybe that would be more apt if this were web app rather than a 10s of lines training script
- ben_w 2y agoSure, or at least close enough on the exact number for the point to remain valid. But that doesn't preclude ChatGPT doing it anyway — my CSS/JavaScript knowledge was last up to date some time before jQuery was released, and ChatGPT is helping me make web apps.
- tux2bsd 2y ago> Sure, or at least close enough on the exact number for the point to remain valid. I hope no one has to work with you, you're insufferable.
- whimsicalism 2y agoAt least hundreds of thousands, likely millions