3 ms·
> vitalik didn't credit him in his article You mean this article? https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2021/06/18/verkle.html https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/202
by a1369209993 2y ago
> vitalik didn't credit him in his article
You mean this article?
https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2021/06/18/verkle.html https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2021/06/18/verkle.html
> Verkle trees are still a new idea; they were first introduced by John Kuszmaul in this paper from 2018[link to [0]],
0: https://math.mit.edu/research/highschool/primes/materials/2018/Kuszmaul.pdf https://math.mit.edu/research/highschool/primes/materials/20...
- Zamiel_Snawley 2y agoI want to highlight the fact that the quote from Vitalik’s article is the first sentence of the second paragraph. Credit is prominently given, not buried in any way.
- ChadNauseam 2y agoOh, I wonder if he edited it, I googled it to find what the GP was talking about and saw this which claimed he didn't: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27557503 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27557503
- olddustytrail 2y agoFrom your link: vbuterin on June 19, 2021 | prev | next [–] Thanks! I actually wasn't aware of the intellectual history. I added a link to your paper at the start of my post.