3 ms·
Meta/Facebook kind of have a track record of strong claims that doesn't really hold up when scrutinized. From https://www.llama.com/ https://www.llama.com/ >
by diggan 2y ago
Meta/Facebook kind of have a track record of strong claims that doesn't really hold up when scrutinized.
From https://www.llama.com/ https://www.llama.com/
> The open-source AI model [...] Llama is the leading open source model family
Then from https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-3.2-1B
> License: Use of Llama 3.2 is governed by the Llama 3.2 Community License (a custom, commercial license agreement).
In that license: Section 1(b)(i) requires you to display "Built with Llama" (branding requirements, really?). Section 2 has additional restrictive licensing requirements. Section 5(c) has retaliation that your license is terminated if you initiate legal proceedings. There is probably more too.
Pretty close to "Not Open Source". Yet, Meta continue marketing Llama as such.
- mistrial9 2y agoyes and, it is essential that Meta is doing this with LLama at this time.. it is literally at their whim. so, complicated...
- gopher_space 2y agoIt feels safe to ignore licenses on models trained with copyrighted material. Meta should feel free to open that can of worms if they’re bothered by it.
- HeatrayEnjoyer 2y agoThere is no way that legal proceedings clause could hold up.