3 ms·
They sure aren't playing defense against nobody.
by talldayo 2y ago
They sure aren't playing defense against nobody.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> sure aren't playing defense against nobody What?
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2y agoI believe "pro-consumer economic policy" would be the FTC and "the most successful and influential [economists]" would be playing adversary to the FTC, hence "they [the FTC] sure aren't play defense against nobody" to support their previous assertion.
- azinman2 2y agoExcept what economists are against the FTC? Usually it’s companies suing them, or vice versa. Maybe like 1 guy at the Heritage Foundation or something?
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> what economists are against the FTC? Very few. Non-competitive markets are a well known market failure [1] and a condition that an unchecked political economy tends towards. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_failure https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_failure
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2y agoUnless I'm mistaken, this comment was posted in the comment section for an article talking about an economist who testified in court in opposition to the DoJ in a case that was brought by the FTC.
- azinman2 2y agoSo they are playing defense for everybody?