2 ms·

> It is totally possible right now to at least generate images with no discernible tell. I have yet to find examples of this

grumbel 2y ago
There are numerous tricks and LORAs to make realistic images without the overpolish you get by default: * https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1fvs0e1 https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1fvs0e1 * https://old.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1fak0jl/finally_an_update_on_improved_training_approaches/ https://old.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1fak0jl/fi...
- daedrdev 2y ago
  Haha, I think I can maybe tell on like one or two of those
mitthrowaway2 2y ago
In the linked webpage, the following videos would be good enough to trick me: - The monkey in hotspring video, if not for its weird beard... - The koala video I would have mistaken for hollywood-quality studio CGI (although I would know it's not real because koalas don't surf... do they?) - The pumpkin video if played at 1/4 resolution and 2x speed - The dog-at-Versailles video edit If the videos are that good, I'm sure I already can't distinguish between real photos and the best AI images. For example, ThisPersonDoesNotExist isn't even very recent, but I wouldn't be able to tell whether most of its output is real or not, although it's limited to a certain style of close-up portrait photography. https://this-person-does-not-exist.com/en https://this-person-does-not-exist.com/en
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2y ago
  > limited to a certain style of close-up portrait photography Not to take away from your point but it's more limited than one might think from this phrase. As an exercise, open that page and scroll so the full image is on your screen, then hover your mouse cursor within the iris of one of the eyes, refresh and scroll again. (Edit: I just noticed there's a delayed refresh button on the page, so one can click that and then move their mouse over the eye to skip a full page refresh.) I've yet to see a case where my mouse cursor is not still in line with the iris of the next not-person.

grumbel 2y ago

There are numerous tricks and LORAs to make realistic images without the overpolish you get by default: * https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1fvs0e1 https://www.reddit.com/gallery/1fvs0e1 * https://old.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1fak0jl/finally_an_update_on_improved_training_approaches/ https://old.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1fak0jl/fi...

daedrdev 2y ago
Haha, I think I can maybe tell on like one or two of those

mitthrowaway2 2y ago

In the linked webpage, the following videos would be good enough to trick me: - The monkey in hotspring video, if not for its weird beard... - The koala video I would have mistaken for hollywood-quality studio CGI (although I would know it's not real because koalas don't surf... do they?) - The pumpkin video if played at 1/4 resolution and 2x speed - The dog-at-Versailles video edit If the videos are that good, I'm sure I already can't distinguish between real photos and the best AI images. For example, ThisPersonDoesNotExist isn't even very recent, but I wouldn't be able to tell whether most of its output is real or not, although it's limited to a certain style of close-up portrait photography. https://this-person-does-not-exist.com/en https://this-person-does-not-exist.com/en

lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 2y ago
> limited to a certain style of close-up portrait photography Not to take away from your point but it's more limited than one might think from this phrase. As an exercise, open that page and scroll so the full image is on your screen, then hover your mouse cursor within the iris of one of the eyes, refresh and scroll again. (Edit: I just noticed there's a delayed refresh button on the page, so one can click that and then move their mouse over the eye to skip a full page refresh.) I've yet to see a case where my mouse cursor is not still in line with the iris of the next not-person.