3 ms·
I appreciate these definitions and distinctions. Thanks for sharing. You've helped me understand that I need a better, more precise vocabulary about this topic.
by Nathanael_M 2y ago
I appreciate these definitions and distinctions. Thanks for sharing. You've helped me understand that I need a better, more precise vocabulary about this topic. I think on an abstract level I would think of AGI as "the brain that's capable of understanding", but I really then have no way to truly define "understanding" in the context of something artificial. Maybe ChatGPT "understands" well enough, if the output is the same.
- adastra22 2y agoIt does understand to a certain degree for sure. Sometimes it understands impressively well. Sometimes it seems like a special needs case. Ultimately its understanding is different than that of a human’s. The issue with the “once OpenAI achieves AGI [sic], everything changes” narrative is that it is based off models with infinite integrals in them. If you assume infinite compute capability, anything becomes easy. In reality as we’ve seen, applying GPT-like intelligence to achieve superhuman capabilities, where it is possible at all, is actually quite difficult, field-specific, and time intensive.