3 ms·
David Korn would not agree with you. "A lot of effort was made to keep ksh88 small. In fact the size you report on Solaris is without stripping the symbol tabl
by chasil 2y ago
David Korn would not agree with you.
"A lot of effort was made to keep ksh88 small. In fact the size you report on Solaris is without stripping the symbol table. The size that I am getting for ksh88i on Solaris is 160K and the size on NetBSD on intel is 135K.
"ksh88 was able to compile on machines that only allowed 64K text. There were many compromises to this approach. I gave up on size minimization with ksh93."
https://m.slashdot.org/story/16351 https://m.slashdot.org/story/16351
- kragen 2y agoit sounds like he did agree, even laboring under the heavy burden of bourne shell compatibility