3 ms·
“Don’t blame them, they just haphazardly throw money at projects without vetting them properly” Well uuhhh, maybe they shouldn’t? Would a bare minimum of due d
by FridgeSeal 2y ago
“Don’t blame them, they just haphazardly throw money at projects without vetting them properly”
Well uuhhh, maybe they shouldn’t? Would a bare minimum of due diligence not be ok lol?
- tempusalaria 2y agoYC cannot do a ton of due diligence. Their strategy is to back many companies with small amounts of money, basically in the hope that a few companies in the batch end up as unicorns. This means they want to select founders capable of getting those outcomes, which will also select many liars/psychopaths due to the need for variance/risk taking behaviors in these founders. Now is there a problem where YC and many other VCs basically advise founders to commit fraud and lie to customers/stakeholders? Yes but that has nothing to do with YC admissions strategy. I’ve seen many VCs (including YC) advocate for lying and unethical behavior by their founders. It’s a big problem in the startup industry, and often the biggest brunt of this is taken by unsuspecting employees. One reason I would never advise someone to join a startup is the massive prevalence of unethical and dishonest founders.
- tptacek 2y agoI have not (W20) seen any instances of YC advising companies to commit fraud.