4 ms·
The bits of a movie on a DVD depict regions of space evolving over time. The DVD and its bits exist in space and time but they are static and the spatial arrang
by danbruc 2y ago
The bits of a movie on a DVD depict regions of space evolving over time. The DVD and its bits exist in space and time but they are static and the spatial arrangement of the bits is pretty much unrelated to the space depicted by the movie. If you had sufficiently good eyes and mental DVD decoding capabilities, you could look at the DVD and get a God's eye view of the world, see all of space and time at once, at least the parts captured in the movie.
Similarly in a computer game, to run into a wall does not require the player and the wall to be next to each other in any real sense, it is sufficient that some code knows which memory locations to inspect to detect a collision and constrain the motion accordingly. Similarly running into a wall in the real world does not require that you are next to the wall in some fundamental sense, the universe could at a very deep level just be a list of object coordinates and the laws of nature would cause a force whenever two coordinates become very close.
I will agree with you that it is much harder to think of time in a similar way but I am willing to consider this potentially a limitation of human brains. From Einstein we know about the close relationship between space and time and I can relatively easily make sense of the idea that spatial relationships are not fundamental, so maybe that just carries over to time, even though my brain can not make sense of it.
- TheOtherHobbes 2y agoThis is one take on what Bohm called the implicate order, and which is implied in non-locality and superdeterminism. Reality is a projection of a hidden system which operates under completely different rules. And when we get down to the quantum level, we start seeing that essential information is somewhere else. You can't look at a single electron and see that it's entangled. So where does the entanglement information live? It's clearly not inside the electron. Is a measurement really an interaction with the projection mechanism? This sounds like simulation theory, but it doesn't have to be. There might be a super-causal system of relationships and meta-objects without needing a "computer" made by a conscious entity to keep track of their relationships.
- mystified5016 2y agoYou seem to be talking about the "hidden variables" interpretation. As far as I understand, that theory has been disproven experimentally. The core idea is that entangled particles 'know' their final state when they are created. That information is hidden from observers until measured, but the result is not truly random in the way that QM implies. Experiments have proven that this cannot be true, but I don't understand it well enough to descibe here.