Yes, that's why we need a new 80,000 person agency to work out the details of enforcement. It's not like it's hard to pick out many, many instances of this. Li

Yes, that's why we need a new 80,000 person agency to work out the details of enforcement. It's not like it's hard to pick out many, many instances of this. Licensing requirement for hairdressers? Rent-seeking. Blocking the demolition of an abandoned gas station for high-rise construction? Rent-seeking. Longshoremen prohibiting automation of ports? You'd better believe that's a rent-seeking. Will there be edge cases and mistakes? Of course. But there'll be an incredible economic surplus from which to compensate any such victims, with all the progress enabled by removing the rent-seekers.