I'm not sure I understand your confusion. Yes, any vetting that occurred would have occurred in the past. Clearly there wasn't as much vetting as some other com

I'm not sure I understand your confusion. Yes, any vetting that occurred would have occurred in the past. Clearly there wasn't as much vetting as some other comments i've seen might have hoped. Nevertheless, a system which requires minimal vetting (as suggested by others) only works if participants aren't literally fraudulent. I'm just repeating myself though. That's all in my original comment.