4 ms·
“You didn’t pay enough to my view of experts, but you won, but you could have won and paid more, and that’d be better.” That’s your argument? Just to be clear?
by eastdakota 2y ago
“You didn’t pay enough to my view of experts, but you won, but you could have won and paid more, and that’d be better.” That’s your argument? Just to be clear?
And, note, this strategy has worked pretty (cost) effectively for us before:
https://blog.cloudflare.com/winning-the-blackbird-battle/ https://blog.cloudflare.com/winning-the-blackbird-battle/
But you’d suggest we do what everyone else does and hire expensive “experts”? K. Good luck with that.
Oh, forgot, that’s your profession… expensive expert. Carry on.
- btrettel 2y agoI do think that you all should have paid more. But I'm fine with the bounty program, as long as it's fairly compensated. I don't like the compensation of you all's program, but from the discussion I've had here, it's clear to me that many folks are fine with it. Fair enough, they can participate if they want to. Also: I'm not saying that patent search firms are perfect. Albert Cory had a comment here about how the quality of search firms varies dramatically. But I do think that searching is a skill which can be developed. Many of the examiners I worked with at the USPTO were outstanding searchers who could find information in their area very quickly. It can be hard for someone looking to purchase patent search services to know who is good, unfortunately.
- eastdakota 2y agoAnd your profession is…?
- btrettel 2y agoI'm a mechanical engineer. I mostly run and write fluid simulation code for a living. Much better paid and much lower stress than patent examining.
- eastdakota 2y ago:-p