4 ms·
> an esp32 that I'm not easily finding a part number for so may as well be Tenscilica On their dev board it's the usual esp32-wroom. They also say their esp32
by tredre3 2y ago
> an esp32 that I'm not easily finding a part number for so may as well be Tenscilica
On their dev board it's the usual esp32-wroom. They also say their esp32 firmware needs esp-idf 4.2, which doesn't support any of the risc-v esp32. So it is xtensa.
I agree that everything could be done with the esp32 alone (well, an wrover with extra RAM) but this project seems to be just a guy experimenting and having fun! Although I can see how someone might be cynical regarding this project being deliberately complicated/overengineered just to extract more money from the nlnet fund.
- Neywiny 2y agoGreat for experimentation, but that's where it should end. If this is a cash grab or anyone is seriously considering buying it I think better products do or could exist. They'd be easier -> cheaper to design, maintain, source and assemble. 3 chips to do what's already built into the SoM connector is unideal.