3 ms·
Track the impacts on https://www.spaceweather.com/ https://www.spaceweather.com/
by pfdietz 2y ago
Track the impacts on https://www.spaceweather.com/ https://www.spaceweather.com/
- dylan604 2y agoHoly cow that's an insane website design. So, where exactly do I see the tracking? Is it below the grift of a 3D printed moon? Is it near the ads for casinos. Or maybe the mood rings? This isn't a bitch about ads. It's I honestly cannot easily find the actual information the site is supposedly hosting.
- BenjiWiebe 2y agoThere's an information/status bar on the left. There's a header on top with important info/ current events. Then it's kind of in blogpost format. And if you ever want to know what info was there last year, there's an archive viewer on the top right, that actually shows the page just like it was, at any date!
- mystified5016 2y agoWoah, they must be doing something weird to get past ad blockers. This is an outrageous monstrosity of a website
- dylan604 2y agoWeird as in self-hosting? This is what ads should be like instead of 3rd party auction data harvesting non-sense. It's just some people have no concept of couth, or less is more, or self control. There's no stopping bad taste.
- damiankennedy 2y agoThey're not using an automated ad service of any kind they have manually put these ads in the source code of their web page. We all see the same ads. I prefer it, these ads mean something to the people that run the site, they put some effort into putting them there and presumably purchasing the products benefits the organisation in some way. They also have a no AI disclaimer at the top.
- dylan604 2y ago> these ads mean something to the people that run the site I wouldn't go that far. They mean something as in somebody was willing to spend money, so this is what they get in return. Just look at the randomness of the types of ads. I doubt there was any "qualifying" of the ads other than did the check clear.
- grayfaced 2y agoI spent way too long trying to find basic info before I gave up on that site. The two questions I was hoping to see: 1. When will it be the strongest 2. What latitudes should expect to see auroras. The first question is answered by: https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/3-day-forecast https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/3-day-forecast (Strongest at Fri 2100-0000 UTC)
- gonzo41 2y agoYou've just been sheltered by bootstrap for the last 10 years. All science on the web is 'fun' like this.
- pfdietz 2y agoI love the design! It has heart.
- drmpeg 2y agoLooks good to me even on Netscape 4.7. https://www.w6rz.net/netscape.png https://www.w6rz.net/netscape.png
- animex 2y agoInsane? It's pretty typical for an early 2000s era site.
- hattmall 2y agoThat site design is awesome. That level of information density is exactly what makes a good site. The information is right in the front, ads are off to the side. It's basically like a newspaper. Which is great for information.
- pfdietz 2y agoAnd it loads really fast. Slow-ass loading (and things jumping around as the ads load) are what really drives me to ad blockers.
- partomniscient 2y agoMy 'local' page is [1] which is fairly simple but likely has only the information you're interested in, nothing else and none of that side-scrolling bullshit you need to do to see the forecasts on the https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/ https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/ page. [1] https://www.sws.bom.gov.au/ https://www.sws.bom.gov.au/
- AlienRobot 2y agoThanks, I'll add it to my bookmarks.