3 ms·
The judge is there to interpret and to apply the law. If there's a hole, there's a hole. And the incentives would be immense to find a legally defensible hole.
by RhysU 2y ago
The judge is there to interpret and to apply the law. If there's a hole, there's a hole. And the incentives would be immense to find a legally defensible hole. Think bug bounty on an unfathomable scale.
- immibis 2y agoWhen the law says "companies can't own themselves, even indirectly, or the CEO goes to jail" the judge will be able to see that company A owning company B which owns company A is indirect self-ownership, and send the CEO to jail. No matter how complicated a scheme the CEO comes up with, the judge can likely see through it.