3 ms·
> The point is that in a world that tolerates the ongoing existence of FAANG (+Adobe +Microsoft +Oracle etc.) as the monopolies they already are you must allow
by BoiledCabbage 2y ago
> The point is that in a world that tolerates the ongoing existence of FAANG (+Adobe +Microsoft +Oracle etc.) as the monopolies they already are you must allow large acquisitions in order to enable the emergence of new competitors
You keep asserting this without any evidence. I keep explaining why this is false.
Instead of asserting it again, would you mind explaining how you view that Adobe being allowed to purchase Figma in anyway increases competition with any FANNG companies?
- fidotron 2y ago> You keep asserting this without any evidence. I keep explaining why this is false. You keep failing to read what I wrote. > Instead of asserting it again, would you mind explaining how you view that Adobe being allowed to purchase Figma in anyway increases competition with any FANNG companies? You are the one making assertions with no evidence. You even make assertions about what I have said which are obviously wrong.
- BoiledCabbage 2y agoI will try one last time. You keep making statements of the form "you must do A to get B". I keep asking you to explain why, and your answer is "I already stated it before. You must do A to get B". Either attempt to actually explain the specific link, the specific steps between A and B, or admit there is nothing more you're giving than empty assertions. Someone who refuses to support his/her points is not worth debating.