The model in the paper isn't a "real" RNN due making it parallelizable, for same the reasons described in https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08819 https://arxiv.org/abs

The model in the paper isn't a "real" RNN due making it parallelizable, for same the reasons described in https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08819 https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08819 , and hence is theoretically less powerful than a "real" RNN (struggles at some classes of problems that RNNs traditionally excel at). On the other hand, https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04517 https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04517 contains a "real" RNN component, which demonstrates a significant improvement on the kind of state-tracking problems that transformers struggle with.