3 ms·
Would it be a valid for someone to take "GPL v2" (with no or later version) clause, and re-license a derivative work as "GPL v2 or later", and then another enti
by throwlicense 2y ago
Would it be a valid for someone to take "GPL v2" (with no or later version) clause, and re-license a derivative work as "GPL v2 or later", and then another entity takes that derivative work and re-licenses it as the "GPL v3"?
That seems to be what's happened here. The b2 software is a strict "GPL v2". There is no later clause. Then WordPress has re-licensed their derivative work as "GPL v2 or later". Now we are talking about a GPL v3 derivative work.