5 ms·
While I like what they stitched together, it has nothing to do with meta ... at the end of the day, any camera can do the same
by Justin_K 2y ago
While I like what they stitched together, it has nothing to do with meta ... at the end of the day, any camera can do the same
- 39896880 2y agoMeta just released an internet connected camera disguised as eye wear. That makes this situation quite different. If a person wants to reject being photographed, they move away from the person holding the camera, or avoid public places that have surveillance systems. The expectation has now been increased: to reject being identified, a person must avoid people wearing glasses. Far more people wear glasses than hold a camera.
- BriggyDwiggs42 2y agoIn basically any public space, there are tons of people on their phones, and the sense that these people could easily be turning a camera towards me is, for me at least, constant. I don’t think this is very new.
- 39896880 2y agoYou don’t think the camera being on a person’s face is different from them holding it in their hands?
- BriggyDwiggs42 2y agoI understand the practical difference of angle, but in terms of how it affects public places for me, I mean that I already feel constantly surveilled. I really don’t feel like it makes much of a difference for me.
- fragmede 2y agoHow many people would notice a pen sticking out of a pocket? https://www.ispypens.com/ https://www.ispypens.com/