3 ms·
Its not that the language was "problematical," its just that the contents were more sensitive then I think they realized, and so they were held to account for t
by DiscourseFan 2y ago
Its not that the language was "problematical," its just that the contents were more sensitive then I think they realized, and so they were held to account for the specificities of the language they used.
- pjc50 2y agoLike the Air Canada case? https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20240222-air-canada-chatbot-misinformation-what-travellers-should-know https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20240222-air-canada-chatb... You are potentially liable for the contents of your work emails. This includes if you put a stupid disclaimer at the bottom. People have gone to jail over the contents of chat. It's one thing to take notes on a criminal conspiracy and another thing to have the AI make one up and drop you in it because you didn't read the email it sent.
- DiscourseFan 2y agoObviously I can't talk specifics, but no it wasn't that stupid. More like general negligence on their part.
- eru 2y agoWell, just use an AI that scans for that problem, then. (I'm not entirely serious, but also not entirely joking. Looking for these kinds of red flags is probably more within the ability of contemporary systems than reliably writing prose.)