> According to Matt his comments are being cleared by his lawyers. If that is true - which it almost certainly isn't - his lawyers are laying the grounds for a

> According to Matt his comments are being cleared by his lawyers. If that is true - which it almost certainly isn't - his lawyers are laying the grounds for an appeal due to 'incompetent' representation. Which would be rejected on the grounds that it was so obviously their intention that it constitutes competent representation. The lawsuit is irrelevant; the behaviour is the issue.