4 ms·
I think it was in reference to the "possible tortious interference with Automatticc's contracts" and "We have screenshots and archives of all these tweets inclu
by darylteo 2y ago
I think it was in reference to the "possible tortious interference with Automatticc's contracts" and "We have screenshots and archives of all these tweets including when they were posted" messages in one of the screenshots.
You don't mention "contracts" or that you're putting things "on the record" on a whim.
- TekMol 2y agoTrue. That's a pretty mild "threat" though. I would say reminding someone that they might be involved in committing a breach of contract and what the indications of the breach are is reasonable. Otherwise, nobody could remind anybody to stick to a contract without being accused of threatening behavior.
- darylteo 2y agoIn this context I would disagree... the "act" in question has allegedly already occurred, as such there is no way for the recipient of a "reminder" to make any changes to avoid a breach.
- TekMol 2y agoSo if someone punched you, there is no ethical way to tell them that it is not ok and that you have the ability to counter?
- darylteo 2y ago... when did ethics come into this? "I'm warning you" "Hey! Back off!" -- My disagreement in the previous comment had nothing to do with the alleged "threat" or the ethics of... it was the idea that it was simply a "reminder".
- sleepybrett 2y agonothing mild about it
- blitzar 2y agoActually it reads like someone with a tiktok level of legal knowledge trying to substatitate an empty and shallow threat - on a whim. A proper (legal) threat takes the form of a piece of paper with a letterhead of some person who gets paid $5,000 an hour to make people question their life choices and shit their pants for a living.