4 ms·
I understand the pragmatic point of view but that doesn't mean I can't point out its flaws or that this was some necessary compromise - it was a choice. There's
by zaptheimpaler 2y ago
I understand the pragmatic point of view but that doesn't mean I can't point out its flaws or that this was some necessary compromise - it was a choice. There's no reason the Go platform couldn't be as stable as it is and also not be a braindead language from the 90s.
As an example Rust has its flaws but it does have all the modern language niceties with great tooling, build system and a solid platform.