4 ms·
> anyone with fair knowledge of LLMs and E/R should be able to devise it. While this may be true, I think it overlooks a really important aspect. Current LLMs
by Version467 2y ago
> anyone with fair knowledge of LLMs and E/R should be able to devise it.
While this may be true, I think it overlooks a really important aspect. Current LLMs could be very useful in many workflows if someone does the grunt work of properly integrating it. That’s not necessarily complicated, but it is quite a bit of work.
I don’t think we’ll hit a capabilities wall anytime soon, but if we do, we’ll still have years of work to do, to properly make use of everything llms have to offer today.
- larodi 2y agoThis grunt wall is these 10-20% that the model gets wrong, or just misbehaves. And it can be lotta struggle. I'm not talking about easy stuff like writting a letter to customer, but classification and text2code, which is hard Stating this after just finished my long overdue masters and the topic was text2sql with a pinch of my own thing. Hundreds of papers are written on this topic, and only when complex agents, multi-prompting + actual discreete systems play together things start ot work. So just tossing all in the context is not a solution. In practice, I agree, the llms have their role in software, as classifier, graphics segmentation, code assist, etc. But it is very wrong to put all eggs in the same basket, and this basket is very very very shade one.