3 ms·
>Will you continue to use that dangerous doctor just for the sake of your misguided principle? What a weird interpretation of what I said. Obviously I mean a
by ziddoap 2y ago
>Will you continue to use that dangerous doctor just for the sake of your misguided principle?
What a weird interpretation of what I said.
Obviously I mean a competent doctor that uses AI-assistance in a responsible manner, not a dangerous doctor that commits malpractice.
- yugffred 2y agoIt’s helpful to examine extremes to see where your logic breaks down. You are assuming a “competent” blogger even in the face of a slop banner. How will you know the doctor is competent? All you know is they give sloppy diagnoses. How will the op know the blog writer is competent? Their metric is “if they use slop at the top of their blog it’s a waste of their time to investigate further”.