> Intel’s internal testing comparing 0x12B microcode to 0x125 microcode indicates performance impact is within run-to-run variation Sneaky wording. Aren't the

> Intel’s internal testing comparing 0x12B microcode to 0x125 microcode indicates performance impact is within run-to-run variation Sneaky wording. Aren't they supposed to be testing the version before 0x125, considering it is the first one that may have potentially negative effect on performance? > eTVB Microcode algorithm which was allowing Intel® Core™ 13th and 14th Gen i9 desktop processors to operate at higher performance states even at high temperatures. a. Mitigation: microcode 0x125 (June 2024) addresses eTVB algorithm issue. emphasis mine.