2 ms·
Respectfully, no. IDEs made it easier to navigate a huge codebase with things like autocomplete and one-click refactor. This made it easier to make huge codeba
by nunez 2y ago
Respectfully, no.
IDEs made it easier to navigate a huge codebase with things like autocomplete and one-click refactor. This made it easier to make huge codebases that _require_ these QoL add-ons over time. I think this was a factor that made outsourcing software development (to countries with weak or non-existent worker rights) possible at scale.
In a similar vein, highly paid software engineers are using LLMs to generate more and more of the code they ship.
If highly paid SWEs can write code by shoveling a sentence into Copilot, _literally anyone can._
We seem hellbent on destroying our profession for the sake of "productivity" (i.e. using less of our brainpower to churn our features faster).
But what do I know? I'm just a simpleton that uses vim and writes code the old-fashioned way.
- spiderfarmer 2y agoI'm a solo entrepreneur first and a solo developer second, so I'm looking at this from a very different angle.
- nunez 2y agoExactly. As a solo entrepreneur, using ChatGPT to produce an acceptable MVP to test PMF makes all of the sense. People used to pay big money for that. Whether you scale that strategy once your business becomes viable is dependent on whether you give a shit about software quality or not. That's the long-term concern I have with this flavor of AI.