4 ms·
Yes, because the counter point to that reduces to "criminals do crime" and that is never a good argument against the personal rights of the smallest, lest power
by boltzmann-brain 2y ago
Yes, because the counter point to that reduces to "criminals do crime" and that is never a good argument against the personal rights of the smallest, lest powerful, most vulnerable, and most disenfranchised unit in the legal system, the private person.
- cubefox 2y agoThe private person is vulnerable because he maybe can't use an emulator and need to buy a Switch instead?
- boltzmann-brain 2y agono one ever said that, stop derailing arguments. this is bs.
- cubefox 2y agoSo why specifically is the private person vulnerable in this case?