4 ms·
Not even that would be good enough because a lot of sham reqs still interview and then reject later.
by mckn1ght 2y ago
Not even that would be good enough because a lot of sham reqs still interview and then reject later.
- trillic 2y agoWhy? To burn money?
- red-iron-pine 2y agoaye was my thought. interviewing is expensive and time consuming, and has a very small but greater than zero chance of turning into a lawsuit. throwing up a bunch of job adverts up on a low cost platform is comparatively simple and requires no real activity after putting them up; just ignore the emails.
- taurath 2y agoIf nobody should be forced to hire someone, then maybe they should be forced to give metrics on how many people are hired vs job reqs posted, and that information should be given to the candidates. Good luck hiring people if you don't actually want to fill 80% of your roles and candidates know it.
- t-3 2y agoThe way it works for the unemployed is if they don't take an offer, benefits get cut off. So it would be on the company to prove that each rejected application did not meet the standards they were looking for (trivial - just use the same unrealistic expectations many companies already have: 10 years experience in $5_year_old_tech).