4 ms·
I mean, yeah, he's been pretty clear that about that and the trademark complaint was awfully light on evidence of actual trademark issues. He doesn't like their
by eli 2y ago
I mean, yeah, he's been pretty clear that about that and the trademark complaint was awfully light on evidence of actual trademark issues. He doesn't like their business model, doesn't think they contribute enough upstream, etc.
But that's just not something you get to control when you license your software as GPLv2. Some people are gonna use it in ways you don't like.
He should have just done an marketing campaign about why you should host with Wordpress.com instead of WP Engine. Instead he's torched an insane amount of goodwill for seemingly no return.
- kmeisthax 2y agoWordPress.com isn't a good comparison to WP Engine. For starters, you can't install plugins, because you're renting out a single site on a multisite network and any custom plugin code would trivially violate the paper-thin isolation between tenants. WP Engine provides separately containerized servers and databases so you can do whatever. It's like the difference between getting an account on a Mastodon instance versus a specialized Mastodon instance hoster.
- desas 2y agoWordPress.com allows plugins on the business and e-commerce plans. Sites with plugins are hosted in isolated environments. This has been the case for years and years.
- kemayo 2y agoIt's an okay comparison really, so long as you compare the right bits. WordPress.com has cheaper and lower-feature plans than WP Engine's lowest one ($20/month), but once you hit that same price tier ("Business" @ $25/month) you can install plugins. WP Engine is a pure commercial WordPress hosting service, while WordPress.com also has a personal blogging service stapled on.