Gary takes credible facts there (modest gains, ai is not replacement for clear thinking), altough attacking the "10x" claim is a cheap shot because the claim wa

Gary takes credible facts there (modest gains, ai is not replacement for clear thinking), altough attacking the "10x" claim is a cheap shot because the claim was always nebulous. However, in light of Gary's other AI related writings[0], it is clear he's not saying "people, be clear headed about the promises and limits of this new technology", he's saying "genai is shit". Yes, I am attacking the character/motive instead of the argument, because there's plenty of proof about the motive. So I am kind of agreeing (facts as laid out) and vehemently disagreeing (the underlying premise his readers will get from this) with the guy at the same time. [0]: Here are a few headlines I grabbed from his blog: - How much should OpenAI’s abandoned promises be worth? - Five reasons why OpenAI’s $150B financing might fall apart - OpenAI’s slow-motion train wreck - Why California’s AI safety bill should (still) be signed into law - and why that won’t be nearly enough - Why the collapse of the Generative AI bubble may be imminent