3 ms·
Yeah it's just too slow AND too expensive to be an option. I've compared between the two before and train was like 4 days and $500 while the flight was 3 hours
by bongodongobob 2y ago
Yeah it's just too slow AND too expensive to be an option. I've compared between the two before and train was like 4 days and $500 while the flight was 3 hours and $200.
- angmarsbane 2y agoI would much rather take my kids (aged <5) on a train to visit family than on a plane.
- bluGill 2y agoI thought that too until I looked at the complex connection I'd have to make (long layovers...) high prices and how long it takes. I end up making the 20 hour drive as the time lost is still my best value and I beat the train.