> Everyone will be in it if they have access to the LLM wizard. You're arguing that everyone might be good at sports if they had a personal trainer. How is thi

> Everyone will be in it if they have access to the LLM wizard. You're arguing that everyone might be good at sports if they had a personal trainer. How is this not a good thing? If you take these models only by the base value they provide, you might be able to eliminate private tutoring from the equation and make performance of students more comparable. I am far from happy that these models originate from shady for-profit corporations with dubious incentives, but a state actor could just as well train a model for support in education. > Your response is to rely on opaque knowledge agents produced by the largest and shadiest corporations that humanity has ever known. This is ironic. My teachers organized a big week about the importance of the personal carbon footprint when I was still in high school (~2015). The personal carbon footprint is criticized for shifting blame for climate change to personal consumer behavior, rather than corporations and was subject of a big advertising campaign from BP [0]. I think you overestimate the average teacher in terms of their ability to think critically and overall skill in their respective subjects. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_footprint#Shifting_responsibility_from_corporations_to_individuals https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_footprint#Shifting_resp...