Given your stealth edit, I can’t help myself but to respond. The statement that you’re not familiar with the case was an edit added after I posted. Whether or

Given your stealth edit, I can’t help myself but to respond. The statement that you’re not familiar with the case was an edit added after I posted. Whether or not what the article says is correct (it’s ambiguous), what you said is not. Your post said: A nationwide injunction issued by the federal court takes precedence over any conflicting state court decision, as per the "Supremacy Clause" in the constitution. This is flat out an incorrect statement.