2 ms·
> But when people talk about "fairness", it usually means quality of life right? The ability to afford good healthcare, high quality food, housing, security, pr
by anon291 2y ago
> But when people talk about "fairness", it usually means quality of life right? The ability to afford good healthcare, high quality food, housing, security, providing for a family, social opportunities. How are we defining fairness?
Then why is it that the same people who go on about inequality continue to go on about inequality when countries raise the entire standard of living but have more inequality as a result.
For example, by and large, the modern day economic system (let's just call it capitalism) has caused the greatest increase in standard of living for the average world resident. We live at a time of unheard of prosperity and abundance for the vast majority of people. They are way better off today under this economic system.
Yet the constant criticism of this system is that there are really rich people. Why is that a criticism when the data are pretty unequivocal that the system also makes things better for everyone else?
- directevolve 2y agoDirectly analogous to the fact that drugs have side effects. Massive inequality and other attendant ills are undesirable side effect of a net beneficial system.
- anon291 2y agoAlright sure, but like if you are on metformin for diabetes and you complain about the side effects, that's one thing, and we can try lessening them (and should). But inequality is used as an argument against capitalism. That's like using the side effects of metformin as 'evidence' that it's not effective at increasing insulin sensitivity and lowering blood sugar. The data are quite unequivocal... it is.