3 ms·
1. It's not actually refuting the point being made which is "it's seems hard to take advantage of LLMs' capabilities", which to me seems like a good point that
by jamilton 2y ago
1. It's not actually refuting the point being made which is "it's seems hard to take advantage of LLMs' capabilities", which to me seems like a good point that stands on it's own, regardless of who is saying it.
2. The original post is, to my eyes, not implying anything about training a model to help use other models, so the second part seems irrelevant.
- passwordoops 2y agoI disagree. The comment is striking directly at the claim that people aren't taking "advantage of LLMs' capabilities". This is their capability and no amount of "clear communication" is going to change that