2 ms·
I don't believe this is completely accurate. Controlled deorbiting of orbital stages (upper stages) is a subject of ongoing FAA rulemaking [0], but it is not cu
by perihelions 2y ago
I don't believe this is completely accurate. Controlled deorbiting of orbital stages (upper stages) is a subject of ongoing FAA rulemaking [0], but it is not currently required AFAICT, and as best as I can find it is *not* done in the majority of non-SpaceX launches [1].
[0] https://spacenews.com/new-upper-stage-disposal-rules-help-not-harm-us-leadership-space/ https://spacenews.com/new-upper-stage-disposal-rules-help-no...
[1] https://outerspaceinstitute.ca/osisite/wp-content/uploads/OSI_response_to_FAA_NPRM.pdf https://outerspaceinstitute.ca/osisite/wp-content/uploads/OS... ("Uncontrolled reentries are currently used for 35% of U.S. missions (62% if we exclude SpaceX)")
(As a tangential curiosity, Ariane 5 (and perhaps some other LH2/LOX upper stages) lacks any capability [2] to do this, even if they wanted to: because those engines are designed in a way that can only be ignited once. To do a controlled re-entry into the atmosphere, it's a prerequisite that you have a rocket that can be turned on and off at least twice).
[2] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094576520302241 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00945...
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- verzali 2y agoIt shouldn't matter whether you are controlled or not, you still need to show the risk is under 1 in 10,000. If you have a satellite for example, they usually enter uncontrolled and you still need to calculate the risk of killing someone. This was part of the whole SpaceX trunk thing, since the models showed the risk was very low, but then reality showed they could actually reach the ground. It's easier generally to meet the threshold with a controlled reentry because you can choose more or less where it re-enters.