Half the article is about subtractive colour, which happens to be print/painting/any kind of colour mixing which isn't combining light sources. The author (is

Half the article is about subtractive colour, which happens to be print/painting/any kind of colour mixing which isn't combining light sources. The author (is it you?) has done zero research on the topics they don't understand, and deserves any amount of critical writing in response. The whole point of the internet is that it represented the end of people waffling bullshit, access to accurate information is there, and if people want to run around spreading incorrect information they deserve to be taken down as many notches as possible. I might also add that this is important to the authors conclusion, should the author has done any real research they'd see that not only does a colour wheel that addresses their concern exist, but that they've misrepresented the foundation of their entire argument to begin with.