> Building a product by transforming a collection of works cannot be fair use by any stretch of the imagination. A) The courts are deciding this now, and B) we

> Building a product by transforming a collection of works cannot be fair use by any stretch of the imagination. A) The courts are deciding this now, and B) we already live in a sick reality distorted by the DMCA and we need a major copyright reform. > I have to assume from your casual dismissal that you're not aware of the consequences of missing it. You managed to completely ignore what I said about diminishing energy requirements for compute. You're arguing disingenuously and now you're attempting to insult my intelligence instead of focusing on the argument. It's really telling that this is the typical fashion in which these argument play out. I have no interest in continuing a conversation like this if you can't make good-faith assumptions in your argument as per the Hacker News guidelines.