3 ms·
Reinstalling from images is resource intensive and take time and bandwidth than a simple "reboot into the old verision", while with NixOS all they need is provi
by kkfx 2y ago
Reinstalling from images is resource intensive and take time and bandwidth than a simple "reboot into the old verision", while with NixOS all they need is provide their own channel.
On Arch they could provide their own repos as well, of course, but a thing is keeping some derivations in sync, testing them etc, another is keeping a classic distro "de-facto semi-fork", it's again an order of magnitude more complex, resource intensive and time consuming. It's much simpler and faster a declarative ecosystem and developing with it then the classic model, astonishingly faster and simpler.
I know many have never tried so do not know, but the IT at Valve I expect should be a bit beyond "the many who have never tried", so well, just curious why.
- alias_neo 2y agoI understand where you're coming from, I love NixOS and it seems like it could be well suited in a way, but it is extremely complex to learn Nix, and it doesn't have the scale or support Arch does, on top of being a massive departure from the typical distro and I think Valve want the Steam Deck to be a straight up portable PC. Being pragmatic about it, I just don't think NixOS was ever a contender.