4 ms·
So my problem with MSFT's big plan is that I simply don't know it. I do know the price I'm paying for using Emacs and Vim. Even though (in theory) they are com
by iLemming 2y ago
So my problem with MSFT's big plan is that I simply don't know it.
I do know the price I'm paying for using Emacs and Vim. Even though (in theory) they are completely free, in reality there's a price there. Vim and Emacs require time, patience, and dedication, just like any other tools. I know who gains from my choice - myself, the community, and the industry.
I knew exactly how JetBrains profited from my choice of using IntelliJ in the past - I paid for the license and renewed it every year.
But what's MSFT's scheme here? They're giving me this beautiful, nice tool completely for "free"? What price will I have to pay for that choice in the future?
I'm sorry, but I think every dev should remain at least a bit skeptical, do you truly believe that Microsoft, a colossal corporation with a market capitalization comparable to the GDP of Germany, spends an enormous amount of resources to build "a free" code editor, because... I dunno, they love you or something?
- AshAnnouncer 2y ago> But what's MSFT's scheme here? They realized by pushing typescript they can drive companies away from java, then when those companies will realize typescript sucks they'll be redirected to c#
- neonsunset 2y agoIt would be funny if it worked that way but luckily or unluckily it doesn't.
- CrimsonCape 2y agoWe are in uncharted territory. This major corporation has a "big plan" that relies on making their product offerings "open source" while simultaneously surrounding it with a minefield such that the "open source" aspect is camouflage/subterfuge. "Subterfuge Source" has a nice ring to it, and abbreviated "SS" really drives the point home as well.